Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Apr 30, 2013

  • generate draft of research proposal by end of today. 
    • intro about SFR vs. redshift
    • observable proxies for SFR (emission line EW)
    • why study this in high mass clusters, previous work.
    • Why is SPT sample special?
      • highest-mass clusters across wide range of redshifts
      • existing spectroscopic data that includes some emission line galaxies
      • independent x-ray mass estimates for many of these clusters. 
    • we can therefore explore the redshift dependence of SFR in the most extreme cluster environments, across 0.2<z<1.

...

The galaxy cluster sample we plan to use is selected from South Pole Telescope (SPT; Carlstrom et al. 2011) observation exploiting the Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect. The sample consists of high-mass clusters across a wide range of redshift (0.2 < z < 1.3), of which most also have spectroscopic data (from Magellan, Dressler et al., 2006 or Gemini, Hook et al., 2004) with emission line measurements. Furthermore, independent mass estimates from hot gas X-ray emission are also available for many of these clusters. Using these data (and perhaps more if follow-up observations are possible), we will be able to explore the redshift dependence of SFR in the highest-mass clusters.

 

May 10, 2013

  • Go through and learn the spectroscopy reduction process using raw data files provided by Jonathan
  • discuss with Chris about the project. How about Matt's suggestion of "SPIRE image of SPT clusters"?
  • write quick summary of key papers, including a clip out of key plots.
  • arrange meetings with 1) jonathan ruel, 2) matt bayliss to talk about Gemini and Magellan existing spectroscopy.

...

  •  

 

May 14, 2013
Some references to start back-tracking through the literature in galaxy evolution in the cluster environment:
IMACS