| designator | Issue | decisional level or committee (faculty, dept, College, division, school, Univ, etc) | concerns and considerations | Summer 2023 urgent? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Expectations of privacy for GAI access through Harvard licensing or on Harvard systems, for staff, faculty, students. | Likely Univ level. | This could be a question of interpretation of current policies. | Yes |
| 2 | Limitations on what information can be uploaded for GAI queries. Student records? CVs of job applicants? | Likely Univ level. | This could be a question of interpretation of current policies. | Yes |
| 3 | Declaration of use- if GAI tools are used to compose emails, memos, letters of recc, should this be declared? | Likely Univ level. | Yes? | |
| 4 | Can GAI tools be used in the preparation of senior theses and PhD dissertations? If so, what attribution is appropriate? | EPC, GPC | Yes | |
| 5 | Is it appropriate to use GAI tools for automated 'grading'? | School? | Need to distinguish feedback from assessments that are used to assigning grades. | Yes |
| 6 | who 'owns' student-generated coursework? Can they upload it? Can instructors? | |||
| 7 | What subset of GAI tools can we use, that avoids uploaded material being used as training data? | |||
| 8 | How do we evaluate, and on what criteria, potential tools and vendor offers? | |||
| 9 | ||||
| 10 |
General
Content
Integrations