Library Reference Chatbot
DRAFT: Project Charter: Library Reference Chatbot
Project Goals
Increase self-service efficiency for common and repeatable library reference questions.
Improve user experience by providing 24/7 access to reliable reference support.
Seamlessly route complex or sensitive questions to appropriate library staff.
Reduce staff time spent on routine inquiries while preserving high-quality human support.
Problem and Value Statements
Problem Statement
Library users frequently have general reference questions that require staff mediation even though some answers may be routine or easily standardized. This creates delays for users and increases staff workload.
Solution and Business Value
Implement a chatbot designed to answer general library reference questions and escalate complex inquiries to staff.
Enables vendor-compliant traceability and auditability.
Aligns with Harvard’s Zero Trust and modern identity management principles.
Reduces technical debt and administrative overhead.
Enhances user equity and experience across all campuses and affiliations.
Alignment with Harvard Library Multi-Year Goals and Objectives
FY26 Objective 5: Advance the development and delivery of a range of consultation services and resources supporting the discovery, exploration, creation, and sharing of research and scholarship
Alignment with HUIT Objectives
Supports modern, scalable digital service platforms.
Leverages automation responsibly.
Vision
Library Reference Chatbot | ||
A trusted virtual reference assistant that answers common questions and connects users to staff when needed. | ||
Strategic Objectives | Guiding Principles | Key Performance Indicators |
|
|
|
In Scope/Out of Scope
In Scope
General library reference questions.
Integration with library websites.
Escalation workflows.
Out of Scope
In-depth subject research consultations.
Deliverables and Work Products
Task | Outcome | Responsible Parties |
Functional Requirements Drafted | Clear definition of scope of included data sources and day one functionality outlined | LTS / HL |
Vendor engagement to expose needed data. | Development agreements and schedule finalized. | LTS/Vendors |
Communication campaign | Staff and faculty informed by Winter 2027 | HL Communications / LTS / Project Team |
General Availability of chatbot | Tool released for general use Spring 2027 | HL / LTS |
Definition of Done
Chatbot live in production.
Approved knowledge base.
Functional staff escalation.
Stakeholders
Stakeholder | Title/Role | Participation |
VPDR | Project Sponsor | Approval and oversight |
LTS | Lead implementer | Project management, system integration |
HL Reference Team | Co-lead | Requirements gathering; testing |
External Vendors | Development Partners | Creation of MCP layers, chat widgets |
HL Communications | Support | Communication and messaging development |
Public Services Staff | Operational partner | Guest support and user guidance |
Project Team
Portfolio | Key Member & Role | Affiliation |
Library Technology Services | Project Manager, Laura Morse | LTS |
Information Technology Services | Technical Lead, TBD | LTS |
Harvard Library | Project Lead, Lee LaFleur | HL |
Harvard Library | Project Team, Reed Lowrie, Emily Bell, TBD | HL |
Communications | Consultant, TBD | HL Communications |
Cost and Estimated Schedule
Phase | Phase Start | Phase End | Completion Milestone |
Planning & Vendor Coordination | Spring 2026 | Summer 2026 | Functional requirements delivered to vendors. Project plans created. |
Development | Summer 2026 | Winter 2027 | Sprints for development complete. |
Testing | Fall 2026 | Winter 2027 | Testing of agile releases complete. |
Communication & Training | Winter 2027 | Winter 2027 | Community awareness campaign complete |
Rollout out | Spring 2027 | Summer 2027 | System is live and available to all users. |
Assumptions, Constraints, Dependencies, and Risks
Assumptions
Harvard Library Website and key Springshare data will be used for knowledge base, as determined by partner teams and vendors.
External partnership with other peers and vendors will inform tool.
Constraints
Resource availability across HL and LTS teams.
Coordination across multiple vendor platforms.
Dependencies
Creation of MCP and or API service by Springshare.
Development partnership with Clarivate on proof of concept for tool.
Risks
Delays in vendor completion of data processes.
Resourcing for Springshare data cleanup, if needed.