...
Since FY15, we have been experimenting and developing workflows and procedures for working with electronic files. As of FY17, most legacy carriers have been imaged, and digital archivists are making electronic files ready for processing shortly after collections are accessioned. As a department, we're still feeling out what to do, why, and how when it comes to working with electronic files. As each collection is worked with, we gain more experience and expertise, which can help to revisit and revise our current guidelines and workflows. Please provide feedback on the process, and suggestions as to how to improve this documentation, to your team lead Kelcy and/or Jen Weintraub.
What follows are suggestions for approaching appraisal and processing of electronic files removed from carriers.
Appraisal | Processing decisions (mainly about arrangement) | Access issues | Models to follow | Examples | Description in finding aid
APPRAISE:Anchor appraise appraise
...
If you're unsure or have questions about what files to keep or what to discard, discuss with your team lead and Kelcy and the digital archivists.
Familiarize yourself with some different models of treatment and description that might assist you in figuring out what to keep and how to arrange files.
PROCESS (particularly if/how to arrange):Anchor process process
...
Are they arranged in meaningful folders on their carriers? Or are they just put on the carrier as a means of transport?
EXAMPLE: Process of appraising electronic files for March for Women's Lives Records (from Cat Holbrook):
"In The March for Women’s Lives material, there were not many files to look at, and since I had processed the collection not that long ago, I looked at the files in Quickview, with the FA open in front of me. Using my folder titles and scope notes, I knew that the electronic material was duplicated in the collection, and since the electronic material was blank forms, telephone scripts, and things of that nature, I made the decision that we did not need to keep these materials in electronic form."
ACCESS considerations. Can these files be linked through the finding aid? (Are there restrictions, has the donor agreed that material can be made available online? Are restrictions different for different types of files?)Anchor access access
If yes, determine (with Jen, PabloZachary, team leadKelcy) if there are normalization needs, what are the available ways we can deposit into DRS.
...
Consult with team leadKelcy, Cat Holbrook, and Paula Aloisio on these steps as needed. [Also information to come: how to normalize and provide access to non word processing files such as images etc.]
| Anchor | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MODELS of arrangement and description
Every collection is, as we know, DIFFERENT (!) and workflows for different kinds of records and situations will vary. See below for how this workflow worked with different models of collections. Feel free to use these models to guide you, in consult with team lead Kelcy and digital archivists.
MODEL A: Born digital files are closely related to the paper files, and (due to their file uniformity and small number) can easily be transformed into PDF/As, deposited into the DRS, and linked out through the finding aid.
...
These born digital files were all word processing documents, and Susan knew from the disk names and the collection materials that they were intimately related to the other records (primarily audiotapes) in the collection. She reviewed the files on R, and determined that each electronic transcript would be a separate "E folder" in the finding aid, listed after the audiotape of the interview. She transformed the word processing files into PDF/A files, Cat deposited those files in the DRS, and links to each file were added into the E folders in the finding aid.
EXAMPLE: Elizabeth Moulton Papers, Series III.
MODEL B: Born digital files are closely related to the paper files and are described as such, but access considerations mean the material cannot be linked directly from the finding aid.
EXAMPLE: Mary Bunting Institute Records, see Series VI, subseries C.
"E folders" were created for electronic files that were closely related to paper files. Some Bunting Institute records are restricted, and therefore the files can not be linked from the finding aid.
EXAMPLE: Elizabeth Holtzman Papers, see end of Series II, subseries G.
EXAMPLE: National Women's Political Caucus Records, in multiple series.
MODEL C: Born digital files are the same type as other paper files, but are not as directly linked. They are grouped by series and described in more general terms.
...
EXAMPLE: Robin Kilson Papers
| Anchor | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Other collections with born digital material described in the finding aid:
****************************************************************************************
...
Then when you print it, the program will ask where you want to save it.