Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

583 1# $a committed to retain $c 20181001 $d  indefinite  $f ReCAP Shared Collection  $5 HUL

  • Note, if Ex Libris Libris provides an enhancement to add items fields related to retention, item records will be updated accordingly.

Proposed Batch Metadata Updates

LTS proposeswill:

  • Creating itemized sets of items in Alma using spreadsheet data provided by Jim Hodgson as input. 
  • Updating items identified for retention with a note in Statistics Note 2.
  • Applying a norm rule to add the 583 of linked holdings, after holdings linked to items in the set.  Norm rule will first checking that field 583 $f ReCAP Shared Collection is not present already

...

  • Is the retention byte going to be updated also?
  • Are the ReCAP commitment for specific items owned at that time, or are new acquisitions also going to be committed?
  • Whose responsibility is it to develop/communicate policies on manual creation, maintenance, etc to make sure conflicts in coding don’t develop in future
  • Is there contention between previously entered 583 fields and current fields?
  • Is work on this a higher priority than Google scanning processing or the creation of the metadata file for Ivies Plus?
  • What is the intended workflow for items that are marked lost or missing?  Do these need to be sent to collection development staff?

Impact on Ongoing Workflows

  • Staff will need training to look for this the commitment statement before withdrawing items.
  • Workflow documentation would need to be developed for cases when withdrawing a previously committed item occurs.

...