Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Background 

In Aleph, staff had been instructed that name access points (1XX/6XX/7XX fields) merely had to be unique within Aleph. When Harvard implements Alma, automated preferred-term correction in Alma will change access points in bibliographic records if the access point matches a non-preferred term in the LCNAF (4XX). Thus, access points will need to be unique compared to the entire LCNAF—including non-preferred terms in LCNAF (4XXs)—to avoid erroneous access point changes.

...

  1. Create a LCNAF record via NACO if you can base it on a library resource in  in hand or a trusted surrogate of same, and update the OCLC and Alma records accordingly
  2. If you are not a NACO contributor, either 
    1. pass the information on to someone who has that capacity, or 
    2. create a name access point that is unique as prescribed by RDA (see recommendations below), and add the qualifying information to the heading in both OCLC and Alma to cancel the link to the incorrect LCNAF record.

...

...

  1. If you find an appropriate LCNAF, change the access point to the established form;
  2. If you do not find an LCNAF record, and if are a NACO contributor, you may create a NACO authority record if you can bases base it on a library resource in hand or a trusted surrogate of same, and change the access point accordingly;
  3. If you do not find a NACO record, and you do not wish to create one or are not a NACO contributor, please leave the access point as it is, or qualify it with more meaningful qualifying information, as instructed above.

...

NB: Please do not create new access points qualified with “$$c (Harvard local name).”


Revised 20182024-06-1218