ABA | AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION MODEL CODE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, ETHICAL CONSIDERATION 4-1 (1980) |
ABA | AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARDS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE, THE DEFENSE FUNCTION (2d ed. 1980) |
R. ALLEN | STRUCTURING JURY DECISION MAKING IN CRIMINAL CASES: A UNIFIED CONSTITUTIONAL APPROACH TO EVIDENTIARY DEVICES, 94 Harv. L. Rev. 321, 338-353 (1980) |
A.J. AYER | HUME'S FORMULATION OF THE PROBLEM OF INDUCTION, from The Legacy of Hume, in Probability and Evidence 3-6 (1972) |
J. BENTHAM | RATIONALE OF JUDICIAL EVIDENCE, from The Works of Jeremy Bentham 473-479 (Browning ed. 1842), as quoted in 8 Wigmore, Evidence §2291, pp.549-551 (McNaughton rev. 1961) |
BREWER | SCIENTIFIC EXPERT TESTIMONY AND INTELLECTUAL DUE PROCESS, 107 Yale Law Journal, 1535, 1673-1679 (1998) |
E. CLEARY | PRESUMING AND PLEADING: AN ESSAY ON JURISTIC IMMATURITY, 12 Stan. L. Rev. 5-14 (1959) THE SUBSTANTIVE LAW |
L.J. COHEN | THE PROBABLE AND THE PROVABLE 77-81 (1977) |
COMMENTARY | PRIVILEGES IN GENERAL |
COMMENTARY | THE USE OF PRIOR CONVICTIONS |
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BAR COMMITTEE ON LEGAL ETHICS | DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BAR COMMITTEE ON LEGAL ETHICS, Op. 119 (March 15, 1983) |
| S. ESTRICH | Proving Character and Credibility in Sexual Assault Cases, S. ESTRICH, REAL RAPE, Pages 1-7, 42-56 (1987) |
| J. FALKNOR | THE "HEAR-SAY" RULE AS "SEE-DO" RULE: EVIDENCE OF CONDUCT, 33 Rocky Mt. L. Rev. 133-138 (1960) |
| E. GREEN | THE COMPLETE COURTHOUSE, IN DISPUTE RESOLUTION DEVICES IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY, 44-51 (1985 Roscoe Pound ATLA Foundation, Washington, D.C.) |
| H. HART & J. McNAUGHTON | EVIDENCE AND INFERENCE IN THE LAW, in Evidence and Inference 48, 50-51 (Lerner ed. 1959) |
| G. JAMES | RELEVANCY, PROBABILITY AND THE LAW, 29 Calif. L. Rev. 689 (1941) |
| J. LANGBEIN | THE GERMAN ADVANTAGE IN CIVIL PROCEDURE , University of Chicago L. Rev. (Fall 1985) |
| J. McKENNA, J. CECIL & P. COUKOS | "Reference Guide on Forensic DNA Evidence" in Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence (Federal Judicial Center 1994) |
| E. MORGAN | HEARSAY DANGERS AND THE APPLICATION OF THE HEARSAY CONCEPT, 62 Harv. L. Rev. 177, 192-196 (1948) |
| P. MURRAY | Trial Lawyers' Ethics |
| P. MURRAY & J. SHELDON | Should the Rules of Evidence Be Modified for Civil Non-Jury Trials? |
| D. NANCE | CONDITIONAL RELEVANCE REINTERPRETED, 70 B.U.L. Rev. 447 (1990) |
| C. NESSON | THE EVIDENCE OR THE EVENT? ON JUDICIAL PROOF AND THE ACCEPTABILITY OF VERDICTS, 98 Harv. L. Rev. 1357 (1985) |
| C. NESSON | RATIONALITY, PRESUMPTIONS, AND JUDICIAL COMMENT: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR ALLEN, 94 Harv. L. Rev. 1574, 1576-1583 (1981) |
| C. NESSON | REASONABLE DOUBT AND PERMISSIVE INFERENCES: THE VALUE OF COMPLEXITY, 92 Harv. L. Rev. 1187, 1208-1213 (1979) |
| P. NEUFELD & B. SCHECK | BETTER WAYS TO FIND THE GUILTY, New York Times, 6/6/2000 |
| NOTE | THE BASES OF EXPERT OPINION |
| NOTE | THE CONVERGENCE OF FACT AND OPINION |
| NOTE | NEUTRAL EXPERTS |
| NOTE | THE PROCEDURE OF ADMITTING EVIDENCE UNDER RULE 801 (d) (2) (E): Co-Conspirators' Statements |
| NOTE | THE THEORETICAL FOUNDATION OF THE HEARSAY RULES, 93 Harv. L. Rev. 1786, 1786-1807 (1980) |
| NOTE | THE TREASON TRIAL OF SIR WALTER RALEIGH |
| NOTE | WHEN CONDUCT PRESENTS HEARSAY PROBLEMS |
| NOTE | A PROPOSED NEW APPROACH TO CONFRONTATION |
| R. PARK | R. PARK, McCORMICK ON EVIDENCE AND THE CONCEPT OF HEARSAY: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS FOLLOWED BY SUGGESTIONS TO LAW TEACHERS, 65 Minn. L. Rev. 423 (1981) |
| B. RUSSEL | ON INDUCTION, in The Problems of Philosophy, 60-69 (1912) |
| D. SHAVIRO | STATISTICAL-PROBABILITY EVIDENCE AND THE APPEARANCE OF JUSTICE, 103 Harv. L. Rev. 530 (1989) |
| P. TAGUE | PERILS OF THE RULEMAKING PROCESS: THE DEVELOPMENT, APPLICATION, AND UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF RULE 804(b)(3)'S PENAL INTEREST EXCEPTION, 69 Geo. L.J. 851, 862-863, 971 (1981) |
| J. TANFORD & A. BOCCHINO | RAPE VICTIM SHIELD LAWS AND THE SIXTH AMENDMENT, 128 U. Pa. L. Rev. 544, 544-549, 550-551 (1980) |
| J. THAYER | A PRELIMINARY TREATISE ON EVIDENCE 266 (1898) |
| L. TRIBE | TRIANGULATING HEARSAY, 87 Harv. L. Rev. 957, 957-961 (1974) |
| J.R. TYBOR | PERJURY CASE GOES TO DOGS AFTER SHADOW CAST ON WITNESS, The National Law Journal, Sept. 14, 1980, p.4 |
| G. WILL | DNA, THE DEATH PENALTY AND HORRIFYING MISTAKES, The Washington Post 4/6/2000 |