ABA | AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION MODEL CODE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, ETHICAL CONSIDERATION 4-1 (1980) |
ABA | AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARDS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE, THE DEFENSE FUNCTION (2d ed. 1980) |
R. ALLEN | STRUCTURING JURY DECISION MAKING IN CRIMINAL CASES: A UNIFIED CONSTITUTIONAL APPROACH TO EVIDENTIARY DEVICES, 94 Harv. L. Rev. 321, 338-353 (1980) |
A.J. AYER | HUME'S FORMULATION OF THE PROBLEM OF INDUCTION, from The Legacy of Hume, in Probability and Evidence 3-6 (1972) |
J. BENTHAM | RATIONALE OF JUDICIAL EVIDENCE, from The Works of Jeremy Bentham 473-479 (Browning ed. 1842), as quoted in 8 Wigmore, Evidence §2291, pp.549-551 (McNaughton rev. 1961) |
BREWER | SCIENTIFIC EXPERT TESTIMONY AND INTELLECTUAL DUE PROCESS, 107 Yale Law Journal, 1535, 1673-1679 (1998) |
E. CLEARY | PRESUMING AND PLEADING: AN ESSAY ON JURISTIC IMMATURITY, 12 Stan. L. Rev. 5-14 (1959) THE SUBSTANTIVE LAW |
L.J. COHEN | THE PROBABLE AND THE PROVABLE 77-81 (1977) |
COMMENTARY | PRIVILEGES IN GENERAL |
COMMENTARY | THE USE OF PRIOR CONVICTIONS |
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BAR COMMITTEE ON LEGAL ETHICS | DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BAR COMMITTEE ON LEGAL ETHICS, Op. 119 (March 15, 1983) |
| S. ESTRICH | Proving Character and Credibility in Sexual Assault Cases, S. ESTRICH, REAL RAPE, Pages 1-7, 42-56 (1987) |
| J. FALKNOR | THE "HEAR-SAY" RULE AS "SEE-DO" RULE: EVIDENCE OF CONDUCT, 33 Rocky Mt. L. Rev. 133-138 (1960) |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | E. GREEN | THE COMPLETE COURTHOUSE, IN DISPUTE RESOLUTION DEVICES IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY, 44-51 (1985 Roscoe Pound ATLA Foundation, Washington, D.C.) |
| H. HART & J. McNAUGHTON | EVIDENCE AND INFERENCE IN THE LAW, in Evidence and Inference 48, 50-51 (Lerner ed. 1959) |
| G. JAMES | RELEVANCY, PROBABILITY AND THE LAW, 29 Calif. L. Rev. 689 (1941) |
| J. LANGBEIN | THE GERMAN ADVANTAGE IN CIVIL PROCEDURE , University of Chicago L. Rev. (Fall 1985) |
| J. McKENNA, J. CECIL & P. COUKOS | "Reference Guide on Forensic DNA Evidence" in Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence (Federal Judicial Center 1994) |
| E. MORGAN | HEARSAY DANGERS AND THE APPLICATION OF THE HEARSAY CONCEPT, 62 Harv. L. Rev. 177, 192-196 (1948) |
| P. MURRAY | Trial Lawyers' Ethics |
| P. MURRAY & J. SHELDON | Should the Rules of Evidence Be Modified for Civil Non-Jury Trials? |
| D. NANCE | CONDITIONAL RELEVANCE REINTERPRETED, 70 B.U.L. Rev. 447 (1990) |
| C. NESSON | THE EVIDENCE OR THE EVENT? ON JUDICIAL PROOF AND THE ACCEPTABILITY OF VERDICTS, 98 Harv. L. Rev. 1357 (1985) |
| C. NESSON | RATIONALITY, PRESUMPTIONS, AND JUDICIAL COMMENT: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR ALLEN, 94 Harv. L. Rev. 1574, 1576-1583 (1981) |
| C. NESSON | REASONABLE DOUBT AND PERMISSIVE INFERENCES: THE VALUE OF COMPLEXITY, 92 Harv. L. Rev. 1187, 1208-1213 (1979) |
| P. NEUFELD & B. SCHECK | BETTER WAYS TO FIND THE GUILTY, New York Times, 6/6/2000 |
| NOTE | THE BASES OF EXPERT OPINION |