Articles and Treatises

ABA	AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION MODEL CODE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, ETHICAL CONSIDERATION 4-1 (1980)
ABA	AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARDS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE, THE DEFENSE FUNCTION (2d ed. 1980)
R. ALLEN	STRUCTURING JURY DECISION MAKING IN CRIMINAL CASES: A UNIFIED CONSTITUTIONAL APPROACH TO EVIDENTIARY DEVICES, 94 Harv. L. Rev. 321, 338-353 (1980)
A.J. AYER	HUME'S FORMULATION OF THE PROBLEM OF INDUCTION, from The Legacy of Hume, in Probability and Evidence 3-6 (1972)
J. BENTHAM	RATIONALE OF JUDICIAL EVIDENCE, from The Works of Jeremy Bentham 473-479 (Browning ed. 1842), as quoted in 8 Wigmore, Evidence §2291, pp.549-551 (McNaughton rev. 1961)
BREWER	SCIENTIFIC EXPERT TESTIMONY AND INTELLECTUAL DUE PROCESS, 107 Yale Law Journal, 1535, 1673-1679 (1998)
E. CLEARY	PRESUMING AND PLEADING: AN ESSAY ON JURISTIC IMMATURITY, 12 Stan. L. Rev. 5-14 (1959) THE SUBSTANTIVE LAW
L.J. COHEN	THE PROBABLE AND THE PROVABLE 77-81 (1977)
COMMENTARY	PRIVILEGES IN GENERAL
COMMENTARY	THE USE OF PRIOR CONVICTIONS
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BAR COMMITTEE ON LEGAL ETHICS	DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BAR COMMITTEE ON LEGAL ETHICS, Op. 119 (March 15, 1983)
S. ESTRICH	Proving Character and Credibility in Sexual Assault Cases, S. ESTRICH, REAL RAPE, Pages 1-7, 42-56 (1987)
J. FALKNOR	THE "HEAR-SAY" RULE AS "SEE-DO" RULE: EVIDENCE OF CONDUCT, 33 Rocky Mt. L. Rev. 133-138 (1960)
E. GREEN	THE COMPLETE COURTHOUSE, IN DISPUTE RESOLUTION DEVICES IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY, 44-51 (1985 Roscoe Pound ATLA Foundation, Washington, D.C.)
H. HART & J. McNAUGHTON	EVIDENCE AND INFERENCE IN THE LAW, in Evidence and Inference 48, 50-51 (Lerner ed. 1959)
G. JAMES	RELEVANCY, PROBABILITY AND THE LAW, 29 Calif. L. Rev. 689 (1941)
J. LANGBEIN	THE GERMAN ADVANTAGE IN CIVIL PROCEDURE , University of Chicago L. Rev. (Fall 1985)
J. McKENNA, J. CECIL & P. COUKOS	"Reference Guide on Forensic DNA Evidence" in Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence (Federal Judicial Center 1994)
E. MORGAN	HEARSAY DANGERS AND THE APPLICATION OF THE HEARSAY CONCEPT, 62 Harv. L. Rev. 177, 192-196 (1948)
P. MURRAY	Trial Lawyers' Ethics
P. MURRAY & J. SHELDON	Should the Rules of Evidence Be Modified for Civil Non-Jury Trials?
D. NANCE	CONDITIONAL RELEVANCE REINTERPRETED, 70 B.U.L. Rev. 447 (1990)
C. NESSON	THE EVIDENCE OR THE EVENT? ON JUDICIAL PROOF AND THE ACCEPTABILITY OF VERDICTS, 98 Harv. L. Rev. 1357 (1985)
C. NESSON	RATIONALITY, PRESUMPTIONS, AND JUDICIAL COMMENT: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR ALLEN, 94 Harv. L. Rev. 1574, 1576-1583 (1981)
C. NESSON	REASONABLE DOUBT AND PERMISSIVE INFERENCES: THE VALUE OF COMPLEXITY, 92 Harv. L. Rev. 1187, 1208-1213 (1979)
P. NEUFELD & B. SCHECK	BETTER WAYS TO FIND THE GUILTY, New York Times, 6/6/2000
NOTE	THE BASES OF EXPERT OPINION