Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Page History
« Previous
Version 21
Next »
Suggestion | Date discussed | Notes | To do |
---|
Change the message you get when you click on “Library Reserves” for a course which doesn’t have a list. Can this instead say that the course doesn’t have a list instead of “This link is no longer available” | 9/26/24 | There may be a way to mark as “no list expected”; need to verify that this message is the expected one in this case. Is this expected in student view? Labels can be changed: citation.noAccess section.noAccess
- What should it say instead?
- This course currently has no reserve list. If you have any questions, contact your instructor.
| - Verify whether issue is resolved
|
Investigate a better use of tags. Ideas: Additional Public Tags: Awaiting patron recall Scanning in process On order Physical reserve
Additional Internal Tags | 9/26/24 | | |
Make reused digitized books not automatically be marked complete in ALMA DRP item reps not active are showing up as complete after being added to list Students are unable to access because they are inactive All DRP items should not be marked as complete automatically after added to list It should be in Ready for Processing status
https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Leganto/Product_Documentation/Leganto_Online_Help_(English)/Leganto_Administration_Guide/Configuring_Leganto_UI_Elements/Configuring_Automatic_Approval_of_Imported_Resources_in_Leganto | 9/26/24 | | |
(New UI): Writing in “private note” and thinking library can see it. | | - Confirm whether language changes are appropriate
| |
(New UI): Putting book requests in description fields. In List descriptions and section descriptions Is there a way to change the field titles in Leganto to try to make it more clear Is there a way to limit characters
| | - Confirm whether language changes are appropriate
| KY: investigate options for description field limiters Update user doc (possibly with screenshots) to disambiguate fields and discourage use of them Reach out to teaching staff at the end of the semester and remind them of best practices Reach out to teaching staff with link to best practice guide when this happens to correct behavior. Do not enter reserve requests in this field
|
(New UI): Complaint about the “Library Discussion” Send button disappearing. When using the library discussion feature, the send button is sometimes there and sometimes not. We can turn off library discussion if it’s not being used.
| | Example: https://hvd.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/leganto/nui/lists/102613436990003941 - Confirm whether this is still an issue
| KY: submit ticket regarding intermittent issues with send button. Ask reserves processors if we should turn this off We could add something to the help menu instead
|
Public note - no notification so we don’t know if something important was added, like requesting a physical reserve. A tag system would be better. | | Is there a report that could be sent that would alert to presence of something in this field? Check analytics- physical item citations Investigate whether field label could be changed to include more direction. - Make report changes as desired, and then KY can set up auto-emailing?
| |
Receiving notification if a book with a work order on it goes missing. | | | KY to check settings and verify If you delete the work order you get the option to send the message. If you mark something missing, this message isn’t getting sent. People processing the pick-lists need to change workflow to cancel work order before marking book missing.
|