/
The Soo Line Smash

The Soo Line Smash

The Soo Line Smash


On a fine August day, Timmy and his dog, Laddie, were walking along defendant Soo Line's railroad tracks when a Soo Line freight train approached. Laddie did not heed the warning whistle, and Timmy jumped back into the path of the oncoming train to rescue his dog. Laddie was unhurt, but Timmy sustained serious damages when struck by the train. Timmy's parents sued the Soo Line for negligence in the operation of its train.

At trial, plaintiffs offered evidence of a recent U.S. Department of Transportation Assessment report that Soo Line had a comparatively high system-wide accident rate.

What ruling and why?

Related content

Smith v. Rapid Transit, Inc.
Smith v. Rapid Transit, Inc.
More like this
The Exploding Pinto: A Reprise
The Exploding Pinto: A Reprise
More like this
THE EVIDENCE OR THE EVENT? ON JUDICIAL PROOF AND THE ACCEPTABILITY OF VERDICTS
THE EVIDENCE OR THE EVENT? ON JUDICIAL PROOF AND THE ACCEPTABILITY OF VERDICTS
More like this

Copyright © 2024 The President and Fellows of Harvard College * Accessibility * Support * Request Access * Terms of Use