/
Slander per Se
Slander per Se
Slander per Se
Action for defamation. At trial, P is the first witness. P proposes to testify that D said, in the presence of several people, "P is now and has always been a loathsome leper." Dobjects. What ruling and why? Is P's proposed testimony hearsay? If it is hearsay, should it be admitted anyhow? If it is not hearsay, should it nonetheless be excluded?
, multiple selections available,
Related content
HEARSAY DANGERS AND THE APPLICATION OF THE HEARSAY CONCEPT
HEARSAY DANGERS AND THE APPLICATION OF THE HEARSAY CONCEPT
More like this
Hot Goods
Hot Goods
More like this
Silence as Statement
Silence as Statement
More like this
R. PARK, McCORMICK ON EVIDENCE AND THE CONCEPT OF HEARSAY: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS FOLLOWED BY SUGGESTIONS TO LAW TEACHERS
R. PARK, McCORMICK ON EVIDENCE AND THE CONCEPT OF HEARSAY: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS FOLLOWED BY SUGGESTIONS TO LAW TEACHERS
More like this
Thick as Thieves
Thick as Thieves
More like this
Threats
More like this
Copyright © 2024 The President and Fellows of Harvard College * Accessibility * Support * Request Access * Terms of Use